A technocracy is a style of governance where experts make the rules. America is very much a technocracy: experts determine what medicine you can take (FDA), what jobs you can hold (licensing boards), what wages you may work for (NLRB, DOL), how you may build your home (permits), what food you may eat (USDA), who you may buy from (tariffs, DOC), and so on. Like its religious cousin, theocracy, there are heretical questions one mustn’t ask, lest the whole system of faith it is built upon collapses. In the technocracy, that question is “What if we’re wrong?”
The beginnings of the American technocracy started with the “Progressive Era,” a time where the leading minds in the universities, the government, business, religion, and social circles fancied themselves smart enough to run American lives. They determined they were educated enough and the American experiment in laissez-faire had failed; America needed to be ruled by them. Armed with such scientific methods as eugenics, Darwinism, and the like, they set themselves out to save America. The results were horrific: minorities, immigrants, women, mentally ill or retarded, and all those deemed to be weakening the Anglo-American race were kept out of the workforce and forcibly prevented from reproducing (forced sterilization was a common practice during the Progressive Era). Legislation like minimum wage was passed to prevent minorities from working. Mixed-race relations were strictly forbidden to prevent “race suicide.” And these are just some of the crimes committed in the name of technocracy.
We now know eugenics is bunk, but lest we make the mistake of saying “this time it is different” with our 20/20 hindsight, we must remember that these were the leading scientists, economists, and thinkers of the day. This was not a small movement of kooks, but what was honestly thought to be real science. And many people suffered.
And we see the same today, even in the 21st Century. For years, FDA and other “food experts” told us eggs were bad. That’s been changed. Same with sodium. And fat. We were told ethanol would save our environment and car engines; turns out the opposite is true. Other examples are legion.
A technocracy is just as dangerous to the secular Man as a theocracy is to the immortal Man. Both rely upon unassailable priests to interpret the Scriptures and who give orders that must be obeyed without question. Both promise Heaven but deliver Hell. And both cannot tolerate heretics and freedom of thought.
Make no mistake, the experts and those who support them likely believe themselves to be correct. They likely do want what is best for humanity. But they make one simple, but highly flawed, assumption: that they have reached the pinnacle of knowledge. They all suffer from hubris, which applied to a single man is a sin. Applied to a whole nation, it is damnation.
A technocrat being wrong can have disastrous consequences. That is why I advocate for freedom.